2017
two thousand seventeen
Twenty-Seventeen
Subscribe to Wayne County Life RSS post feed
Subscribe to Wayne County Life RSS comment feed
Subscribe to Wayne County Life by email
Wayne County Life on Facebook

By John Addyman
WayneCountyLife.com

   LYONS, NY (JAN 28 13) – Wayne County Sheriff Barry Virts attended a three-day conference with 52 other New York State county sheriffs last week. The subject: New York’s new Secure Ammunition and Firearms and Enforcement Act of 2013, better known as the “SAFE Act.”
   Virts said he had a “strong leadership role” in the preparation of the sheriff’s conference position paper, and outlined the outcome of the discussions in a press statement this afternoon.
   New York’s new gun control law was put together rapidly in the wake of recent mass shootings and Virts noted that he and other sheriffs are concerned that more work may be needed in six areas:
·      Assault weapon ban and definition of assault weapons
·      Inspection of schools by state agencies
·      Reduction of ammunition magazine capacity
·      Five-year recertification of pistol permit status and registration of existing assault weapons
·      Sale of ammunition
·      Law enforcement exemptions
   And at the end of his statement, Virts and the sheriffs wonder out loud if the legislature acted with undue haste without careful-enough consideration of constitutional issues.


   Virts described each element of the new law, then highlighted his position “in concurrence with all 52 sheriffs in attendance”:
   Restriction on Freedom of Information Law requests about pistol-permit holders
By granting citizens the option of having their names and addresses withheld from public disclosure, the new law does provide a mechanism to allow people to decide for themselves whether their personal information should be accessible to the public.
   “I believe, however, that no one should have to explain why their personal information should remain confidential,” Virts wrote. “A better procedure, I believe, is simply to exempt all this personal information from FOIL disclosure.”
   Killing of emergency first responders
   The new law makes killing of emergency first responders aggravated or first degree murder, enhancing penalties for this crime and requiring life without parole.
   “First responders need this protection, evidenced all too often by attacks on them when they attempt to provide help, and in special recognition of the terrible attacks on two firefighters in Webster and attacks on first responders in Jefferson County.”
   Requirement of NICS checks for private sales (except between immediate family).
   “I believe that this will ensure that responsible citizens will still be able to obtain legal
firearms through private transactions, with the added assurance that private buyers are
approved by the federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System. I remain
concerned that this provision will be very difficult to enforce and will likely only affect
law-abiding citizens,” Virts wrote.
   Comprehensive review of mental health records before firearms permits are granted and review of records to determine if revocation of permits is required
   Sheriffs believe that there is an urgent need to increase funding for mental health care. The new law imposes reporting requirements on many mental health care professionals and others who may make a determination that a person is a danger to himself or others.
The law further gives needed authority to courts or others who issue firearms permits to
deny permit applications or to revoke permits already issued.
   “I believe that this issue demands a much more full and detailed discussion about how to keep guns out of the hands of such people. The Sheriffs of New York want to pursue these issues with the Governor and the State Legislature.”
   Safe storage of firearms  
   The new law provides that guns must be safely stored if the owner lives with someone
who has been convicted of a felony or domestic violence crime, has been involuntarily
committed, or is currently under an order of protection.
   “I agree that firearms owners should have the responsibility to make sure that their weapons are safeguarded against use or access by prohibited persons,” Virts said. “The new law adds these protections to ensure that weapons are safely and securely stored.”
   Increased penalties for illegal use of weapons
   The new law adds several increased sanctions for violation of New York gun laws and
creates new gun crimes which did not previously exist. These new provisions will provide added tools for law enforcement to prosecute such crimes.
   “I further believe that the new provisions should help deter future misuse of firearms. The Sheriffs’ Association also suggests that the legislature consider limitations on plea bargaining for all gun crimes.”
   But Virts believes the new law didn’t go far enough in six areas, and perhaps too far overall.
   Assault weapon ban and definition of assault weapons
   “I believe that the new definition of assault weapons is too broad, and prevents the possession of many weapons that are legitimately used for hunting, target shooting and self-defense. Classifying firearms as assault weapons because of one arbitrary feature effectively deprives people the right to possess firearms which have never before been designated as assault weapons. I am convinced that only law-abiding gun owners will be affected by these new provisions, while criminals will still have and use whatever weapons they want.”
   Inspection of schools by state agencies
   The new law transfers to state agencies the responsibility to review school safety plans.
The Sheriffs’ Association expects that funding will be transferred to these state agencies to implement safety proposals. Sheriffs and local police provide this service in all parts of the state and can perform these duties efficiently.
   “As the chief law enforcement officer of the county, sheriffs are in the best position to know the security needs of schools in their own counties,” Virts said, “and the state should help to fund these existing efforts by Sheriffs and local police departments to keep our schools safe.
   “Because sheriffs and local police are already deeply involved with school safety plans, have developed emergency response plans, and are familiar with structural layouts of schools in their counties, they should be included along with state counterparts in any effort to review school safety plans.”
   Reduction of ammunition magazine capacity  
   The new law enacts reductions in the maximum capacity of gun magazines.
   “I believe, based on my years of law enforcement experience, that this will not reduce gun violence. The new law will unfairly limit the ability of lawabiding citizens to purchase firearms in New York. It bears repeating that it is our belief that the reduction of magazine capacity will not make New Yorkers or our communities safer.”
   Five-year recertification of pistol permit status and registration of existing assault weapons
   The new law delegates to the State Police the duty to solicit and receive updated personal information of permit holders every five years in order to maintain these permits. Further, the law requires owners of certain existing firearms now classified as assault weapons to register these with the State Police within one year.
   Virts said the recertification and registration “conflict with sheriffs’ duties regarding issuance of pistol permits. All records should be maintained at the local, and not the state level. This information should be accessible to those who are responsible for initial
investigation of permit applications. Pistol permit information should be maintained in
one file at the local level, and forwarded to a statewide database for law enforcement
use. It bears repeating that it is my belief that pistol permit and any registration
information required by the law should be confidential and protected from FOIL
disclosure.”
   Sale of ammunition
   The new law imposes several new provisions regarding how, and from whom, ammunition can be lawfully purchased.
   Virts believes the law “should be clarified about the use of the Internet as a vehicle
for these sales, outofstate sales to New York residents, and other issues. Businesses have said that they do not understand the new provisions and are concerned that they will have to cease operations.”
   Law enforcement exemptions
   The new law has many provisions that might apply to law enforcement officers and there has been much confusion about whether existing law enforcement exemptions continue to apply.
   “I understand that the Governor and Legislature have already agreed to review and modify these provisions where necessary, and the Sheriffs want to be part of the discussion to make the changes effective. Additionally, the exemptions should apply to retired police and peace officers, and to others in the employ of the Sheriff and other police agencies who perform security duties at public facilities and events.”
   A Note of Caution
   Finally, Virts and the Sheriffs’ Association raised a note of caution about the passage of the bill itself.    
   “It is the view of the Sheriffs’ Association that anytime government decides it is necessary or desirable to test the boundaries of a constitutional right that it should only be done with caution and with great respect for those constitutional boundaries,” he said.       
   “Further, it should only be done if the benefit to be gained is so great and certain that it far outweighs the damage done by the constriction of individual liberty. While many of the provisions of the new law have surface appeal, it is far from certain that all, or even many of them will have any significant effect in reducing gun violence, which is the presumed goal of all of us.
   “Unfortunately the process used in adoption of this act did not permit the mature development of the arguments on either side of the debate, and thus many of the stakeholders in this important issue are left feeling ignored by their government. Even those thrilled with the passage of this legislation should be concerned about the process used to secure its passage, for the next time they may find themselves the victim of that same process.
   “Fortunately, the Governor has shown himself open to working with interested parties to address some of the problems that arose due to the hasty enactment of this law. The Sheriffs’ Association will work with the Governor and the Legislature on these issues.
   “I understand my Constitutional obligations and the concerns of constituents. Sheriffs and other law enforcement officers are not called upon by this new legislation to go doortodoor to confiscate any weapons newly classified as assault weapons, and will not do so.
   “Sheriffs represent all the people, and I took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York. I will continue to enforce all laws of the state and will protect the rights of all citizens, including those rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York.”
   Anyone wishing to discuss these issues and thoughts with Sheriff Virts can reach him at 315-946-5797 or at bvirts@co.wayne.us.
    


Share:

You can make a comment, or trackback from your own site.

4 Comments to "WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF VIRTS CITES HIS POSITION ON NEW SAFE ACT "

  1. dogbaker Said,

    i truly believe the constitutionality of this should be challenged .
    knee jerk reactions never make great law

    Posted on Tue Jan 29, 05:25:00 AM EST

     
  2. Gil Burgess Said,

    What about tackling the REAL problem: mental illness which would include the complex problem of identifying those with symptoms, diagnosing and monitoring those whose tendencies might lead them to inappropriate use of firearms. Although I agree that the "average" person should have no use for an assault rifle, making a show of passing anti-gun legislation is easy compared to trying to do something about stopping those who would be likely to commit some violent anti-social act by some means no matter what.

    Posted on Tue Jan 29, 09:55:00 PM EST

     
  3. Michael Marriam Said,

    Gil,
    All law abiding people have the constitutional right to keep and bear firearms. The purpose of the second amendment is self defense. Semiautomatic firearms are the most effective form of self defense available. To prevent me from protecting myself the best way I see fit is to deprive me of my civil right.

    Posted on Wed Jan 30, 07:20:00 AM EST

     
  4. Gil Burgess Said,

    I won't argue about that. My real point is that the politicians are trying to make a big splash with the anti-gun legislation to make it appear that they are doing something when the real problem is really something else.

    Posted on Wed Jan 30, 09:46:00 AM EST

     

Post a Comment

Most Viewed - Last 30 days